Humane People Cannot Condone Roundup, Slaughter of Geese

July 10th, 2012

> Staten Island Advance Letters to the Editor > Your Opinion letters
Humane people cannot condone roundup, slaughter of geese
Published: Sunday, July 01, 2012, 12:49 AM
By Letters to the Editor/Staten Island Advance Staten Island Advance

by JOHN G. HYNES DVM
NEW DORP

For three summers, the U.S. Department of Agriculture has been invading our city parks to round up and slaughter Canada geese, funded with your tax dollars. The slaughter resumed this week and will continue until the end of July. This was a policy that Mayor Michael Bloomberg initiated in 2009, and it has been happening ever since.

Thousands of geese have been killed in the past three years, and this “War on Wildlife” will continue unless we speak out and demand change. The goose roundups will occur throughout our city parks, including on Staten Island. All of the geese and their recently born babies will be targeted.

The Canada geese and their babies will be rounded up by USDA agents in the darkness of early morning while they are flightless and helpless, brutally stuffed into crates, and loaded onto trucks to be sent to their deaths.

We cannot allow this violent policy to continue year after year in our city, funded by your tax dollars. The time is now to speak out and stand in solidarity for the geese and all our beloved urban wildlife.

Please contact the mayor and your Council member through this link: http://www.council.nyc.gov/html/members/members.shtml

[The writer is a Department of Agriculture Accredited Veterinarian and New York member of the Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association. He practices at the South Shore Veterinary Practice in New Dorp. ]

USDA Slaughters hundreds of Canada Geese in NYC parks

July 10th, 2012

http://us4.campaign-archive2.com/?u=f30b9b8b6b96841f3dcf76c40&id=9765428764

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 10, 2012

Contact: David Karopkin (567) 694-6673, goosewatching@gmail.com

USDA Slaughters 751 Canada Geese from Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge, Sen. Gillibrand Takes Credit

Aviation Experts, Biologists and Ecologists Contend Mass Extermination is Ineffective, Counter-Productive Measure in Addressing Human Safety Concerns

Canada Geese Trucked in High Heat for Over Two Hours, Delivered to Slaughter Facility in Dutchess County, NY, Coalition for the Homeless Opposes Use of Canada Goose Meat to Feed Needy New Yorkers

As reported on the cover of this morning’s Metro NY, yesterday morning USDA agents descended on Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge to capture, remove, and slaughter 751 Canada geese (photos available), under the guise of air safety concerns, according to a press release issued by Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, and confirmed by National Park Services officials. Aviation experts, biologists and Ecologists agree that yesterday’s mass extermination was a scientifically unsound, ineffective, counter-productive and cruel action. The slaughter was embraced for political and financial reasons, ignoring proven, long term solutions which would better address air safety concerns and protect the public.

“Sen. Gillibrand has taken responsibility for the roundup and mass slaughter of innocent animals at Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge, Canada geese which harmed no one and brought pleasure to many. The New York City Canada goose operations have been carried out without public approval or transparency. The justifications given by the USDA and Sen. Gillibrand, that New York City’s geese pose a threat to aircraft, have been widely discredited by aviation experts. Assurances that USDA goose slaughters are conducted humanely have been contested by animal advocacy organizations nationwide. With this decision, Sen. Gillibrand has ignored our plea to reconsider plans for a mass slaughter, and turned a blind eye toward New Yorkers who love animals and care about the preservation of wildlife,” said David Karopkin, Founder and Director of GooseWatch NYC.

Long term solutions must be implemented in order to prevent aircraft collisions with wildlife, annual exterminations will not address the underlying concerns. AVWeb, a leading aviation magazine issued the following statement: “The consensus among wildlife experts appears to be that a goose cull won’t really do much to reduce the likelihood of bird strikes, especially since there are dozens of species of birds that use the preserve. Don Riepe, who serves as the Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge guardian and also sits on JFK’s bird hazard task force, told the Queens Chronicle they already shoot birds and have also eliminated habitat and employed other means to mitigate the bird threat, “But you are not going to reduce the threat to zero.”

Furthermore, if the 751 geese removed from Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge indeed posed a threat to aircraft, such concerns may have been exacerbated by this morning’s action. “Environmentalists know the golden rule of ecosystems: if one species is removed, another species will take over,” said ecologist Ida Sanoff, of Natural Resources Protective Association. “So if the gulls and the geese are gone, there will be more resources available for whatever species moves in to occupy their niche. And that species may be even more problematic.”

“Behaviorists and biologists have been studying culling programs designed to deter aircraft bird strikes involving the Layson Albatross (Gooney Bird) since WWII in the Pacific (Wake, Guam, Midway islands). The findings are clear and unequivocal. Bird density actually increases following culling programs, as other birds move into a culled bird’s territory,” said Environmental Medicine & Pathobiology expert Barry Burns, PhD., Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health (now the “Bloomberg School of Public Health”). Dr. Burns added that “biologists recognize that the breeding population of Canada Geese has been under severe stress from hunting, loss of forage, reduced winter refuge areas, illness and climate change. The New York culling programs are poorly conceived and promoted by political forces with essentially no intellectual or even common sense understanding of the problem. Even now, NYC is killing thousands of birds and air strikes have gone up. The objective should not be to eliminate species which become inconvenient when mankind encroaches on their territory.”

Spokesperson for Sen. Gillibrand Glen Caplan’s claim that the geese rounded up yesterday morning were “euthanized” — a term that is understood to refer to gentle assisted death in circumstances of terminal injury or illness — is both disingenuous and dishonest, and a categorization with which many biologists and veterinarians disagree. “Carbon dioxide asphyxiation used by the USDA is an especially cruel process that slowly strangles geese as they struggle to breathe and compete for oxygen,” said John G. Hynes, DVM, USDA Accredited Veterinarian, NY & NJ.

Although geese slaughtered by USDA agents in New York City parks during the 2009 and 2010 summers were gassed and dumped in a landfill, in 2011 the geese were delivered to Potteiger Meats, a commercial processing facility more than three hours away in New Kingston, PA. The New York Times recently reported that this summer USDA agents have already “corralled and hauled away 255 geese at 12 parks, with a goal of capturing 400 geese at 14 parks.” In response, members of GooseWatch NYC joined in protest at Mayor Bloomberg’s Manhattan townhouse. “The city is trying to spin the killing of New York City’s Canada geese as being a charitable act because their carcasses will be donated to food banks instead of dumped in landfills, under the guise of “doing everything possible to help those in need,” said Karopkin. The Canada geese which were captured yesterday were trucked in high heat over two hours away to an “upstate poultry plant” in Dutchess County, NY according to National Park Services.

Mary E. Brosnahan, Executive Director for Coalition for the Homeless, agreed, saying, “The Coalition objects, in the strongest possible terms, to the plans by officials to slaughter hundreds of New York City’s Canada geese, and to the use of homeless New Yorkers to achieve that end. The plan to feed homeless people the potentially tainted carcasses of these birds through a local soup kitchen or food bank sets a dangerous double standard in which poor men, women and children will eat unregulated and insufficiently inspected flesh.”

New York City’s Canada goose slaughters have been condemned by several national animal advocacy organizations, including the Humane Society of the United States, Friends of Animals, and In Defense of Animals.

Patrick Kwan, New York state director for the Humane Society of the United States, said “This indiscriminate slaughter is inhumane, ineffective and not supported by science. It is the wrong way to address the goose population, especially when more humane and scientific solutions exist and have been successfully implemented.”

“Senator Gillibrand turned Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge into a killing zone this morning, as 751 Canada geese were rounded up, removed and slaughtered while they were molting and unable to fly — thanks to Gillibrand’s wrong-headed, shocking attack on geese in NYC’s only federally protected bird sanctuary,” said Edita Birnkrant, NY Director of Friends of Animals. “Shame on Senator Gillibrand, whose reputation is forever tarred by this bloody, disgraceful attack on New York City wildlife and a refuge.”

“It’s a total disgrace that USDA agents have been allowed to enter the Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge and commit acts of violence on peaceful families of Canada geese. This flies in the face of everything that a wildlife refuge represents,” said In Defense of Animals’ Barbara Stagno. “This is a very sad day for New York City and for the world. We will not stop seeking an end to this savagery.”

GooseWatch NYC, a group formed in 2011, recently publicized that more than 500 New York City residents have joined its emergency alert network, members had extended its Prospect Park program and have been guarding parks citywide around the clock in order to photograph potential roundups. USDA Spokeswoman Carol Bannerman claimed that the agency wants “to provide the least stressful situation for the animals being collected… and if there are lots of people around it could be more stressful.” In response, Karopkin said, “The NYC round-ups are conducted by a federal agency in public parks, and the citizens whose taxpayer dollars support the ‘removal’ programs have a right to view and judge for themselves whether they support these policies. Even media outlets have not been granted access to photograph the roundups.” GooseWatch NYC has put out a call for any witnesses to the roundup operation to come forward, especially those with additional photographs.

STATEN ISLAND COUNCIL MEMBERS IGNORE ANIMAL WELFARE

December 12th, 2011

Where do Island council members stand on animal welfare issues?
Published: Saturday, December 03, 2011, 1:24 AM
By Letters to the Editor/Staten Island Advance
By JOHN G. HYNES
NEW DORP

The following letter was sent to all three of our Council Members, James Oddo, Vincent Ignizio and Debi Rose. All attempts to contact them have gone unanswered:

As the Council Members representing Staten Island, I am concerned that with the exception of Mr. Ignizio’s co-sponsorship and support of Intro 389 (now Intro 49), which would ban the use of wild animals in performances in [New York City], none of you have taken a stand on any serious animal welfare issues, including the corrupt and brutal carriage horse issue.

There is a bill (Intro 86) supported by New Yorkers for Clean, Livable and Safe Streets and many of your colleagues, which proposes the replacement of the carriage horses with replica antique electric cars. Not only is this a more environmentally responsible option for tourism, it completely eliminates the issue of animal cruelty and neglect, and the danger that a frightened horse poses to the public.

I hope you will all seriously review this issue, and join your other colleagues who have signed on to supporting and co-sponsoring Intro 86.

[The writer is a Department of Agriculture accredited veterinarian and New York member of the Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association. He practices at the South Shore Veterinary Practice in New Dorp. ]

© 2011 SILive.com. All rights reserved.

City Carriage Horses are the Walking Wounded

November 14th, 2011

silive.com

City carriage horses are the walking wounded

Published: Saturday, November 12, 2011, 1:55 AM
Letters to the Editor/Staten Island Advance By Letters to the Editor/Staten Island Advance 
By JOHN G. HYNES
GREAT KILLSOn Nov. 1, the Gothamist reported, “The results of a preliminary necropsy on a carriage horse named Charlie who collapsed and died in Midtown last Sunday show, ‘Charlie was not a healthy horse.’ According to the ASPCA, who performed the necropsy at Cornell, he ‘was likely suffering from pain due to pronounced chronic ulceration of the stomach and a fractured tooth.’ Dr. Pamela Corey of the ASPCA says in a release, ‘We are very concerned that Charlie was forced to work in spite of painful maladies.’During a meeting I had with Council Speaker Christine Quinn last year, I expressed my concern about the rampant abuse and neglect of these horses.Her response was “I have inspected those horses, and they seem well cared for.”

Ms. Quinn, you are a politician, not a veterinarian. You are not qualified to make assessments on the medical conditions of these animals. Your repeated lack of support for any significant legislation to improve conditions for animals in this city is well-documented. You are no advocate for animals, and your dismal record speaks for itself.

[The writer is a Department of Agriculture Accredited Veterinarian and New York member of the Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association.] 

© 2011 SILive.com. All rights reserved.

ASPCA FAILS CARRIAGE HORSES DURING HURRICANE IRENE

September 1st, 2011

 

ASPCA failed carriage horses during Hurricane Irene

Published: Thursday, September 01, 2011, 1:15 AM

By Letters to the Editor/Staten Island Advance

 

By JOHN G. HYNES

GREAT KILLS

 

Despite mandatory evacuations, transit shutdowns from 12 p.m. on Saturday, the mayor’s directions to stay off the streets, and laws which state that carriages cannot work during “slippery conditions,” carriage horse drivers forced their horses to work all day on Saturday.

 

Mr. Ed Sayres, director of the ASPCA, and the humane law enforcement of the ASPCA have failed these animals again, as they are negligent in enforcing existing laws meant to protect these animals. A law that is not enforced is to be complicit in the crime.

 

This abusive industry is enabled by our mayor, the ASPCA, the very agency meant to protect these horses, and empowered by Council Speaker Christine Quinn, who has killed all bills to take these horses out of harm’s way.

 

[The writer is a veterinarian and New York member of the Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association.]

 

 

© 2011 SILive.com. All rights reserved.

Carriage-Horses Neglected in Natchez, MS

August 21st, 2011

http://www.clarionledger.com/article/20110817/OPINION02/108170350/Carriage-Horses-Neglected-Natchez

Video of Cole Bros Circus Trainer beating elephants…. Why won’t COUNCILMAN JAMES ODDO stop this circus from performing in his district?

June 26th, 2011

http://www.peta.org/b/thepetafiles/archive/2011/06/23/another-elephant-beating-caught-on-tape.aspx

Please vote YES in this poll to ban horse-drawn carriages in NYC

May 24th, 2011

Please vote YES in this poll to ban horse-drawn carriages in NYC.

http://extratv.warnerbros.com/2011/05/pamela_anderson_wants_to_rescu.php

ASPCA DELINQUENT IN THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES RE: PROTECTING THE NYC CARRIAGE HORSES

February 2nd, 2011

OPEN LETTER TO THE ASPCA by Donny Moss – director of Blinders: The Truth Behind the Tradition

This afternoon, someone forwarded to me an e-mail from the ASPCA’s equine vet, Pam Corey. She was defending the ASPCA against all the complaints they have received about not doing a good job concerning the NYC carriage horse issue. NYC has recently been hit with quite a bit of snow and icy conditions and the criticisms were well founded.

But no one hit it quite on the head with such a sense of completeness as Donny Moss, the director of the award winning documentary about the carriage industry, known affectionately as Blinders.
In 2008, his documentary was released. Donny has continued to be a strong advocate for the carriage horses and for ethics in politics.

First off: this is Pam Corey’s response to criticism:
Since December 1st, New York City carriage operations have been suspended 12 times by ASPCA agents due to weather issues or cold temperatures (18 degrees in the winter.) The park drives are patrolled to evaluate safety of the surfaces and when icy or >slippery, the horse carriages are sent back to the stables. No horses left their stables today, February 1st, due to the ASPCA’s suspension this morning, due to slippery roads. Despite the fact that NYC Parks and NYPD officers, as well as inspectors from the city’s department of health and department of consumer affairs must enforce the laws regulating carriage horses,
The ASPCA agents are the only ones that travel to Central Park to examine the road conditions and take the air temperature. Complaints to this department from around the country state that the ASPCA does nothing to protect the horses. Our continued monitoring of the park and response to complaints shows that this is not true.

thank you for your concern about the carriage horses, we share it.

Sincerely,
Pamela Corey DVM
Director of Equine Veterinary Services
Humane Law Enforcement
=======================================================================
REBUTTAL: this is from Donny Moss

Dear Dr. Corey:
In response to your message, perhaps the following reasons explain why people around the country complain to the ASPCA about your handling of the carriage horses:

1. The ASPCA is silent when your voice is needed the most. At the Mayor’s public hearing on the carriage operator rate hike bill, Bloomberg stated, “The ASPCA has convinced me that the horses are treated humanely.” Why weren’t you at that critical hearing in front of the cameras to correct him and to testify in support of a ban? He could have vetoed the bill.
2. The ASPCA did not show up to Council Member Avella’s press conference announcing the bill to ban horse-drawn carriages. Why? Because you were absent in the press at that critical moment, NYers were left with the impression that it was just a bunch of animal rights extremists who support of a ban.
3. The ASPCA pulled out all the stops to preserve your oversight of the carriage industry when a bill was being considered to take it away from you. Why don’t you put that energy into fighting for a ban?
4. The ASPCA wasted hundreds of thousands of dollars of your donors’ contributions on a lobbying firm that you ultimately fired instead of just using your board of directors, your influence in the City, celebrity spokespeople and PR machine to publicly demand a ban.
5. The ASPCA has fostered an environment where carriage operators are comfortable defying your authority and the law. What, if anything, are the consequences for them?
6. The ASPCA allows the industry to state to the press that the ASPCA has never issued a cruelty summons. Could that possibly be true?
7. The ASPCA continues to give the public the impression that you’re monitoring the industry and protecting the horses when, in fact, your presence is sporadic at best and your absence is palpable on weekends, when the horses are working the most.
8. The ASPCA has publicly thanked Christine Quinn for pushing two marginal bills through the City Council at the expense of the carriage ban and other meaningful bills.
9. The ASPCA’s board member, Cindy Adams, wrote a column in the NY Post in April, 2010 congratulating Speaker Christine Quinn and the ASPCA for the passage of the industry bill that would give the drivers a rate increase but precious little for the horses. Why did the ASPCA not demand a retraction?

——————————————————————————————–
On a final note, why is the ASPCA hosting a party in Palm Beach with Georgina Bloomberg to “celebrate the ASPCA’s recent efforts in protecting horses from abuse and neglect” when you have done so little to help and so much to hurt the abused horses in your own backyard?

Donny Moss

WHY ARE CARRIAGE HORSES OUT IN THE BLIZZARD?

January 27th, 2011
NYC & the Snow Storm.
NYC got hit with 19″ of snow last night and early this morning and it was declared by Mayor Bloomberg to be a “weather emergency.”  Public schools are closed.  Buses are suspended.  Only subways below ground were running.
Emergency city agencies were working – such as police, fire, etc.  Others apparently were closed.
this is from Mayor Bloomberg’s press conference, which is on the city’s web site:
“When the snow stopped falling at about 4:00 AM, the official reading in Central Park was 19 inches. This is roughly twice the amount of snow that yesterday’s evening National Weather Service forecast told us to expect. And we have now had the snowiest January in New York City history. We have had 36 inches since January 1st, breaking a record last set in 1925.

The weather emergency that we declared yesterday afternoon remains in effect. Street cleaning and meter regulations will be suspended today and tomorrow. Clearing the streets remains our number one job – and to do thatmotorists should please, please refrain from driving.

So while Mayor Bloomberg is wisely asking motorists to stay home so they do not get in the way of street cleaning efforts – the horse carriages were allowed out.  From their stables,  up to two miles from Central Park, they need to travel over side streets up 10th Avenue and then to the park.  On the way back, they should be traveling down 9th Avenue, which is a direct route — not through Times Square as some do.

One witness said “For a while the horses couldn’t get to the water trough at 6th avenue, but at 11:15 a.m. a guy came to shovel it out. I didn’t recognise him so I asked if he was with the park but he said he was with the carriage drivers.”

Why did the ASPCA allow the horses out today?    The ASPCA and the Department of Health refuse to answer our questions.  Why does this small industry get to do what they want – who is afraid of whom.  Are they really that politically connected?

Elizabeth Forel
Coalition to Ban Horse-Drawn Carriages
www.banhdc.org
Horses Without Carriages International
www.horseswithoutcarriages.org